Absolutely.  By applying proven imaging and inversion techniques, legacy 2D lines can be re-gridded and processed into 3D seismic volumes.  This approach is not a substitute for a full 3D acquisition, but it offers operators a cost-effective way to visualize structural and stratigraphic features, reduce risk, and maximize existing datasets.  Our work is guided by a renowned geoscientist with 40-plus years of experience in major oil and gas companies. Our scientist has in excess of 40 patents in seismic imaging, bringing both technical depth and business insight.  The result: 3D volumes you can trust to inform exploration and development decisions. 

Multiple 2D Seismic Lines

• Preferably parallel or grid-aligned lines with consistent acquisition parameters.
• Must be in SEGY format or convertible to a compatible format.
• Include inline and crossline coordinates, shot point locations, and time-depth relationships.

 2. Geospatial Metadata

• Accurate navigation data for each seismic line.
• Coordinate system and projection details (e.g., UTM, WGS84).
• Elevation or topographic data for static corrections.

 3. Well Data (Optional but preferred)

• Checkshots or VSPs for time-depth calibration.
• Formation tops and lithology logs to guide stratigraphic interpretation.
• Used to validate and tie seismic reflections to real subsurface features.

 4. Dip and Coherency Attributes

• Derived from the 2D lines using seismic processing software.
• Help guide interpolation between lines to simulate lateral continuity.

 5. Interpolation Engine or Software

• Our Proprietary tools are used to interpolate between 2D lines to create structurally conformable 3D volumes.
• Geostatistical modeling or multi-point statistics are used to estimate missing data between lines reliably.
•  Data is output in a format that is acceptable to interpretation platforms such as Petrel, OpendTect, and Kingdom . 

2D seismic provides a vertical slice of the subsurface along a single line.

3D seismic creates a volumetric cube of data, allowing interpretation in all directions (x, y, z) for more accurate geological modeling.

3D acquisition involves placing geophones in a grid pattern and collecting data from multiple directions.

It requires more equipment, processing power, and time, but yields significantly higher resolution and accuracy.